Staphylococcus aureus (SA)

Antibiotic-resistant superbugs are headline news. We are all familiar with the letters MRSA but perhaps not everyone knows that the SA stands for staphylococcus aureus. You may know them as staph infections. The MA stands for Methicillin-resistant.

Staph aureus is a germ or bacterium that is frequently found on the skin and hair, as well as the noses and throats of people and animals. It is a formidable opponent to medicine and its cunning behaviour on the skin is the subject of a recently published article by Dr Arden-Jones from the Division of Infection, Inflammation and Immunity at Southampton University.

If the success of a bacterium is measured by its ability to survive despite the body’s immune system and antibiotics, then staph aureus is one of the very best. Confusingly it can live on the skin of up to 25% of healthy people and is even more common among those with skin, eye, nose or throat infections, and yet it is responsible for approximately 45% of skin infections in hospitalised patients.

The secret of its success is its amazing ability to protect itself and adapt to different environments. When it comes into with skin it immediately sets about multiplying and defending itself against our immune system. It already has a strong cell wall but this is strengthened further by a substance called fibrin which is produced by the bacterium when it secretes an enzyme (a substance produced by a living organism which acts as a catalyst to bring about a specific biochemical reaction) called coagulase. It also produces a series of specific molecules (a group of atoms bonded together, representing the smallest fundamental unit of a chemical compound that can take part in a chemical reaction) which inactivate human antibodies sent to destroy it by the immune system. The net result is a well defended fortress.

The secret of Staph Aureus's success is its amazing ability to protect itself and to adapt to different environments. When it comes into  with the skin it immediately sets about multiplying and defending itself against our immune system. Impetigenised atopic eczema due to S. aureus.Staph aureus can adopt many different guises or strains. The potential for these strains to sit harmlessly on the skin or suddenly turn nasty and start attacking us seems to lie in their ability to make ‘virulence factors’ (molecules produced by bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa that add to their effectiveness). Once a colony of staph aureus reaches an optimum size, it decides to turn nasty.

This is a clever mechanism known as quorum sensing; in simple words, knowing when there are enough! The microorganisms are then switched by a gene to start causing harm. The mechanism of causing damage involves the production of a series of enzymes and toxins which assist invasion. Each strain of staph aureus produces individual enzymes and hence different strains cause different clinical effects.

Although staph aureus was sensitive to penicillin when it was first developed for widespread use in the 1950s, some strains quickly developed resistance. Methicillin resistant staph aureus (MRSA) was first discovered in 1961. Since then the microorganism has gone on to become resistant to other antibiotics such as fusidic acid which is frequently used in cream or ointment form to treat skin infections.

Staph aureus has an interesting association with atopic eczema. Apart from causing clinical infection of the skin, it is known that over 90% of people with atopic eczema carry staph aureus. Furthermore, the type of staph aureus they carry is more likely to express ‘virulence factors’, i.e. turn nasty. It has a tendency to produce toxins called super antigens which stir up the immune system and cause inflammation.

Infected eczema. Treatment for staph aureus on the skin is directed by the clinical problem - if there are signs of clinical infection appropriate antibiotics are used. The use of antimicrobial treatments such as Dermol and Eczmol can help in the prevention of infection.The treatment for staph aureus on the skin is directed by the clinical problem – if there is no problem, there is no need for treatment; if there are signs of clinical infection, appropriate antibiotics are required. In atopic eczema, however, it is not so clear cut. There is an argument to treat the bacteria even if there are no signs of clinical infection because this stops their number reaching the level needed for quorum sensing to take place.

A number of emollients contain antiseptic agents such as chlorhexidine to assist in the control of staph aureus. These are becoming increasingly recognised in the management of atopic eczema although more clinical trials are needed to confirm their utility. One thing is for sure, staph aureus is a tricky customer particularly in atopic eczema, and any developments towards combating it are welcome.

Information contained in this Articles page has been written by talkmusic based on available medical evidence. Our evidence-based articles are certified by the Information Standard and our sources are available on request. The content is not, though, written by medical professionals and should never be considered a substitute for medical advice. You should always seek medical advice before changing your treatment routine. talkmusic does not endorse any specific products, brands, or treatments.

Information written by the talkmusic team

Next review: 29 November 2022

средства для повышения потенции у мужчин

click hunter